Community Bankers' Advisor

Jan-Feb.2006  

Page 1


Welcome to the on-line
Jan-Feb.2006 issue of the
Community Bankers' Advisor
. . . . . . . . . . .

The Advisor is prepared by attorneys at Olson & Burns P.C. to provide information pertaining to legal developments affecting the field of banking. In order to accomplish this objective, we welcome any comments our readers have regarding the content and format of this publication. Please address your comments to:

Community Bankers' Advisor
c/o Olson & Burns P.C.
PO Box 1180
Minot, ND 58702-1180

olsonpc@minotlaw.com

Also, visit our web site at:
www.minotlaw.com

The attorneys at Olson & Burns represent a wide range of clients in the financial and commercial areas. Our attorneys represent more than 30 banks throughout North Dakota.

Independent Community Banks of North Dakota

January/February, 2006

You are asking . . .

Q: What should a financial institution do if it receives a civil subpoena that specifically asks for the production of Suspicious Activity Reports or a subpoena that, by virtue of its breadth, would encompass Suspicious Activity Reports?

A. If the subpoena does not specifically ask for the production of Suspicious Activity Reports, the financial institution should object to the subpoena on the grounds that some of its responsive material consists of confidential supervisory information. If the subpoena does specifically ask for the production of Suspicious Activity Reports, the simple answer for the financial institution is to send the issuer of the subpoena a written



Firm Profile | Attorneys
State Government | Links | Contact Us | Home

Copyright 1998-2003 Olson & Burns P.C., all rights reserved.
This website is presented for information purposes only and is not intended to provide legal advice.